Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly big language designs (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu as well as many smaller sized companies have established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses across a large range of markets, consisting of software application advancement, health care, finance, home entertainment, customer service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] fashion, [18] and item style. [19] However, issues have actually been raised about the possible abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, making use of fake news or deepfakes to deceive or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Copyright law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and replicate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of producing artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these problems have formerly been explored by misconception, fiction and viewpoint because antiquity. [23] The concept of automated art dates back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where developers such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were explained as having actually developed devices efficient in writing text, creating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of creative automations has actually grown throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been used to design natural languages since their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The scholastic discipline of expert system was developed at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced numerous waves of improvement and optimism in the years since. [31] Expert system research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have used expert system to produce artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was creating and showing generative AI works created by AARON, the computer system program Cohen created to create paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative preparation were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, particularly computer-aided procedure planning, utilized to produce series of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems utilized symbolic AI techniques such as state space search and restraint complete satisfaction and were a “fairly mature” technology by the early 1990s. They were used to create crisis action prepare for military use, [35] process prepare for manufacturing [33] and decision plans such as in prototype self-governing spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its inception, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative models and generative designs, to model and predict data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep knowing drove development and research study in image category, speech recognition, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this age were usually trained as discriminative designs, due to the difficulty of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks efficient in finding out generative designs, rather than discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative models were the very first to output not just class labels for images however also whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network enabled advancements in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] resulting in the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the capability to generalize not being watched to lots of various jobs as a Foundation model. [40]

The brand-new generative models introduced during this period permitted big neural networks to be trained using without supervision learning or semi-supervised learning, instead of the monitored knowing typical of discriminative models. Unsupervised knowing got rid of the need for humans to manually identify information, permitting for bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by a confidential MIT scientist, was a complimentary web application that could generate convincing character voices utilizing very little training data. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content development, affecting subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the development of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more democratized access to premium synthetic intelligence art development from natural language triggers. [46] These systems demonstrated unprecedented abilities in producing photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based upon text descriptions, causing extensive adoption among artists, designers, and the basic public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT changed the availability and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s ability to engage in natural discussions, create imaginative material, help with coding, and perform different analytical jobs captured global attention and stimulated widespread discussion about AI‘s prospective effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) variation of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who maintained that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the standard of ‘basic human intelligence'” since 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta released ImageBind, an AI model integrating multiple methods consisting of text, images, video, thermal data, 3D information, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI model available in four versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, introducing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 family of big language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs showed considerable enhancements in abilities throughout different criteria, with Claude 3 Opus especially outshining leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed improved efficiency compared to the bigger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become an international leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the innovation, exceeding both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is additional evidenced by China’s intellectual home advancements in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using unsupervised artificial intelligence (invoking for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised maker finding out trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or type of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They are capable of natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as structure designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language models can be trained on programs language text, enabling them to create source code for new computer system programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are typically used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can also be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which showed the capability to clone character voices utilizing just 15 seconds of training information. [67] The site acquired prevalent attention for its ability to create mentally expressive speech for numerous imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives subsequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music in addition to text annotations, in order to generate new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a soothing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been produced, like the song Savages, which used AI to simulate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists should get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been created that can be created using a text phrase, category alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, comprehensive and photorealistic video. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the motions of a robotic system to create new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research uses prompts like “select up blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage movements of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can perform rudimentary thinking in action to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when offered the timely pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided style (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could also be established utilizing linked open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help improve workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have been integrated into a range of existing commercially readily available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are also readily available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI designs with as much as a few billion specifications can run on smartphones, embedded devices, and computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion criteria) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can run on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with 10s of billions of parameters can operate on laptop or home computer. To attain an acceptable speed, models of this size may need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For example, the 65 billion criterion version of LLaMA can be configured to work on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI locally include security of privacy and intellectual property, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific focuses on utilizing consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That forum is one of just 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model standards. [93] Yann LeCun has actually advocated open-source designs for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]

Language designs with hundreds of billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, usually run on datacenter computer systems equipped with ranges of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These extremely big designs are usually accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software on the market capable of acknowledging text generated by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation methods for identifying generative AI material consist of digital watermarking, material authentication, details retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both totally free and paid AI text detectors have often produced incorrect positives, wrongly implicating students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and guideline

In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US companies to report information to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act consists of requirements to disclose copyrighted material utilized to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark created images or videos, policies on training data and label quality, restrictions on individual information collection, and a standard that generative AI must “stick to socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly available datasets that include copyrighted works. AI designers have actually argued that such training is secured under reasonable use, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of reasonable usage training have argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works offered to the general public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs take on the content they are trained on. [112]

Since 2024, numerous lawsuits related to the usage of copyrighted material in training are continuous. Getty Images has taken legal action against Stability AI over the usage of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually sued Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A separate question is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by synthetic intelligence without any human input can not be copyrighted, because they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has likewise begun taking public input to determine if these rules require to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has raised concerns from federal governments, organizations, and people, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, calls to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by numerous federal governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has huge capacity for great and evil at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge international advancement” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, but that its destructive usage “might cause dreadful levels of death and damage, extensive injury, and deep psychological damage on an unthinkable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computer systems in fact should be done by them, offered the difference in between computers and people, and between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the jobs for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “synthetic intelligence presents an existential threat to innovative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been viewed as a prospective challenge to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and work issues amongst underrepresented groups globally stays a critical element. While AI promises performance improvements and ability acquisition, concerns about job displacement and biased recruiting procedures continue among these groups, as outlined in studies by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more fair society, proactive actions incorporate mitigating predispositions, promoting transparency, respecting privacy and permission, and embracing diverse teams and ethical factors to consider. Strategies involve redirecting policy emphasis on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s capacity for tailored mentor to take full advantage of benefits while decreasing harms. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI models can reflect and amplify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For example, a language design may presume that physicians and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases are common in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “a picture of a CEO” may disproportionately create pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased data set. A number of methods for alleviating predisposition have been attempted, such as altering input triggers [129] and reweighting training data. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and change them with somebody else’s likeness utilizing artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually gathered extensive attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake celebrity pornographic videos, vengeance pornography, fake news, scams, health disinformation, monetary fraud, and covert foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited reactions from both market and government to discover and limit their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically discovered that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed journal technology) to promote “openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to generate questionable statements in the singing design of stars, public authorities, and other popular people have actually raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In response, business such as ElevenLabs have actually stated that they would deal with mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have generated from AI-generated music. The exact same software used to clone voices has been utilized on well-known musicians’ voices to produce songs that imitate their voices, getting both incredible popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have likewise been used to produce improved quality or full-length versions of songs that have actually been dripped or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually likewise been utilized to produce brand-new digital artist personalities, with some of these getting enough attention to receive record deals at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, including backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also producing artists which create unrealistic or immoral attract their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to develop realistic fake material has been made use of in many types of cybercrime, including phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been used to develop disinformation and scams. In 2020, previous Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being completely practical, they would stop appearing amazing to viewers, possibly leading to uncritical acceptance of incorrect info. [159] Additionally, large language designs and other types of text-generation AI have been utilized to develop fake reviews of e-commerce sites to increase rankings. [160] Cybercriminals have created big language designs concentrated on scams, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, making it possible for enemies to obtain help with harmful demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have demonstrated that open-source designs can be fine-tuned to remove their security constraints at low cost. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI models needs an enormous amount of computing power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the financial resources to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have expressed issues about the ecological effect that the advancement and implementation of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large amounts of freshwater utilized for information centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical power use. [170] [166] [171] There is also issue that these impacts might increase as these models are incorporated into widely used online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models need to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation techniques include factoring possible ecological costs prior to design development or information collection, [165] increasing performance of data centers to lower electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more efficient machine finding out designs, [168] [166] [169] reducing the variety of times that models require to be retrained, [167] developing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological effect of these designs, [168] [167] managing for openness of these models, [167] controling their energy and water usage, [168] encouraging researchers to release information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject matter specialists who understand both machine knowing and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “inferior or undesirable A.I. content in social media, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have actually revealed concerns about the scale of low-grade created content with regard to social media material small amounts, [173] the financial rewards from social networks companies to spread such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific term paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to discover greater quality or desired content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated content by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of websites, were maker translated. Much of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, specifically for sentences that were translated across at least three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based upon text from the Internet, announced that she had actually stopped upgrading the information for several factors: high expenses for getting data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing neighborhood, which “generative AI has contaminated the information”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused an explosion of AI-generated material across numerous domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, roughly 17.5% of recently released computer system science documents and 16.9% of peer review text now integrate content created by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a comparable pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have been developed daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been created using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by models based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI models, problems in the resulting models may take place. [185] Training an AI design exclusively on the output of another AI model produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous model’s output, leads to progressive destruction and ultimately results in a “model collapse” after multiple models. [186] Tests have actually been carried out with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the value of data collected from authentic human interactions with systems might become increasingly valuable in the existence of LLM-generated material in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial data is typically used as an option to data produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be deployed to confirm mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence designs while preserving user personal privacy, [188] including for structured data. [189] The approach is not limited to text generation; image generation has actually been used to train computer vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been utilizing a concealed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a phony AI-generated interview with previous racing motorist Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public appearances since 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing accident. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “deceptively genuine”, and the interview consisted of a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter amidst the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have released articles whose material and/or byline have actually been verified or suspected to be produced by generative AI designs – often with incorrect content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually used generative AI to produce short articles for much of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced tens of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, prompting issues about task losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has historically been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically produced anchors have actually also been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google reportedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce newspaper article” based on input data provided, such as “information of current events”. Some news business executives who viewed the pitch described it as” [taking] for approved the effort that entered into producing accurate and artistic news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to compose 3 articles per day utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not require the knowledge or authorization of the sites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it need the released articles to be identified as being produced or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have undergone cybersquatting, with articles developed by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have revealed issue that generative AI might have a damaging impact on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund local news outlets for experimenting with generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI companies creating a dependency for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which summarizes news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly more reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In response to potential pitfalls around the usage and misuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over decreasing audience trust, outlets worldwide, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have published guidelines around how they plan to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “primarily AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “generally human with some help from AI”. The results of global studies reported that individuals were more uneasy with news topics including politics (46%), crime (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programs website

Technology website

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with extensive abilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media produced with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that mimics conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of large language model
Large language model – Kind of artificial intelligence design
Music and synthetic intelligence – Usage of artificial intelligence to generate music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is created algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of info retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in maker learning

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, businesses, and governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, obtained January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse right now”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ fight versus AI, people win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Quick History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided procedure preparation: the state-of-the-art study”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI organizer based on the HSTS planning framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a standard spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise include an architectural part explicitly dedicated to world modeling (the mode identifier), and differentiate in between control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are unsupervised multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with not being watched knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some type given that ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces possible images of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change people?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Artificial Intelligence in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates six kinds of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-a powerful AI design it states can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, going beyond GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI model – and a creative new method to communicate with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and risks of foundation models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Buying Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please keep in mind that just English voices are available.; Another significant function of 15. ai is its abundant emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, which consisted of 10,000 “top quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers detailed in a paper the ethical challenges that they experienced around the development of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware producer triggers argument over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies by means of text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model develop times with brand-new AI-driven part development methodology|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as startup Runway announces new design”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is primary. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, offered to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system technologies such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software application … the new A.I. features, dubbed Copilot, will be available in some of the business’s most popular service apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert adventure”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will turn into one of the most crucial functions for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and use Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you want to run LLaMA 2 by yourself machine or modify the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are produced in your area, so you do not require an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model at Home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design in your home, you will require a computer system construct with a powerful GPU that can deal with the big quantity of data and computation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I pretty much only trust two LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with strict U.S. export requirements that restrict how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 complimentary software application to identify fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We tested a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a big issue for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for safety, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first guideline on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers elect tougher AI guidelines as draft transfer to last phase”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI guidelines to apply just to products for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also welcoming the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what people consider AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking video game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art market apparently decimated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that clearly demands AI guidelines to secure authors and the works they develop. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has become a crucial sticking point for stars going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently referred to as SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘expert system poses an existential threat to imaginative occupations, and all stars and performers deserve contract language that secures them from having their identity and skill exploited without authorization and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries worldwide are fretted about AI being a danger to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language designs are biased. Can reasoning assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the difficulties of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying state-of-the-art pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech might begin a worldwide showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran use AI to improve anti-U.S. influence campaigns, authorities say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative technologies: Proposing the integration of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has actually begun”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, say experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to generate star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI tunes that mimic popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record deal with AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get prepared for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ predicts the greatest threat is that deepfakes will eventually end up being dull”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we read online as usage of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it suggests for climate modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of artificial intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological expenses are soaring – and primarily secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design suddenly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has constantly been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and typically identifiable. Large language designs generate text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, despite the fact that there is none, and their output emerge all over,” she composed. She offers the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word “dig,” in such a way that people do not, which has actually shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the frequency of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced data”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Threat to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in majority of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A magazine promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was really AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI short article about ladies’s usage of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, everything – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news websites is publishing AI-written short articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter caught using expert system to develop fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are permeating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will upgrade AI feature after unreliable news notifies”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are using AI-generated speakers to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are stunned to find their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI could cause ‘destruction’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta walked away from news. Now the business’s using it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s technique to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.