Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have up until February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid till completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it so much an offer. I think it’s a request to resign with a vague pledge that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been using the term buyout to describe what this is because there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s an extremely deceptive term to use in this situation. When you think of a buyout, there’s normally some sort of composed arrangement or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your recommendations, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout extreme care. There are no warranties consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you change your mind, the agency’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially giving up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious due to the fact that leaving earlier than meant can have severe repercussions, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a great deal for individuals who don’t desire to return to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is extremely generously using to pay them for referall.us eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a lot of individuals’s eyes since there are no warranties. And these are people who love their job. They love the objective of the firm. They strive. And today, they’re dealing with very difficult options, particularly if they’re remote. I mean, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: somalibidders.com Essentially, if you’re somebody who in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal obstacles simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be honest, is so unprecedented that I think a great deal of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not aware of any authority that exists today for OPM to buy firms to provide this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is quite possibly setting the stage for difficulties because I feel OPM has actually greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site regards to usage and consents pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR records are produced on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text may not be in its last kind and might be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and schedule might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.